Login to BatWeb
Forgot your password?
BatMUD Forums > Bs > Re: girls
This just goes to show how Playboy\'s (and other\'s) photographical standards
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
Rating:
3
Votes:
3
This just goes to show how Playboy\'s (and other\'s) photographical standards
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
Rating:
2
Votes:
2
Cannedheat wrote:
This just goes to show how Playboy\'s (and other\'s) photographical standards
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
Rating:
-3
Votes:
3
Nullnullatte wrote:
Cannedheat wrote:
This just goes to show how Playboy\'s (and other\'s) photographical standards
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
have fallen. If you look at the pictures from oldest to newest you\'ll notice
that the women start losing features like body hair, skin texture, ribs,
cheekbones. So for the past 10-15 years the girls might be attractive, but
more as paintings than as actual photographs.
to the magnificent little nub of nothing it is today. I don't know about you
fellas, but i like to actually see what i'm getting into.
Rating:
1
Votes:
3
Mudders getting into Playboy models... that has got to be the sickest
joke of the century
++ Gore
joke of the century
++ Gore
Rating:
1
Votes:
3
Quote:
Mudders getting into Playboy models... that has got to be the sickest
joke of the century
++ Gore
joke of the century
++ Gore
because we are the only ones who can deal with technology. And as we all know
it is much more important than running fast or hitting hard nowadays. So you
have still hope. You can impress girls by configuring their MSN messenger to
show pretty pictures etc.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong." -- H L Mencken
Rating:
2
Votes:
4
Calmar wrote:
Quote:
Mudders getting into Playboy models... that has got to be the sickest
joke of the century
++ Gore
joke of the century
++ Gore
because we are the only ones who can deal with technology. And as we all know
it is much more important than running fast or hitting hard nowadays. So you
have still hope. You can impress girls by configuring their MSN messenger to
show pretty pictures etc.
watching her do that? You? Another nerd? Nope, more likely it's
WellHungAndHutDude69@hotmail.com from www.beautifulpeople.com
Nullnullatte wrote:
Calmar wrote:
Quote:
Mudders getting into Playboy models... that has got to be the sickest
joke of the century
++ Gore
joke of the century
++ Gore
because we are the only ones who can deal with technology. And as we all know
it is much more important than running fast or hitting hard nowadays. So you
have still hope. You can impress girls by configuring their MSN messenger to
show pretty pictures etc.
watching her do that? You? Another nerd? Nope, more likely it's
WellHungAndHutDude69@hotmail.com from www.beautifulpeople.com
and in our current society nerds will winn. So in order to survive these
totally helpless beings know to us as www.beautifulpeople.com will need us
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong." -- H L Mencken
Calmar wrote:
Nullnullatte wrote:
Calmar wrote:
Quote:
Mudders getting into Playboy models... that has got to be the sickest
joke of the century
++ Gore
joke of the century
++ Gore
because we are the only ones who can deal with technology. And as we all know
it is much more important than running fast or hitting hard nowadays. So you
have still hope. You can impress girls by configuring their MSN messenger to
show pretty pictures etc.
watching her do that? You? Another nerd? Nope, more likely it's
WellHungAndHutDude69@hotmail.com from www.beautifulpeople.com
and in our current society nerds will winn. So in order to survive these
totally helpless beings know to us as www.beautifulpeople.com will need us
http://home.c2i.net/am/hobbies.html
was ripped by www.uglypeople.com
Calmar wrote:
Quote:
Mudders getting into Playboy models... that has got to be the sickest
joke of the century
++ Gore
joke of the century
++ Gore
because we are the only ones who can deal with technology. And as we all know
it is much more important than running fast or hitting hard nowadays. So you
have still hope. You can impress girls by configuring their MSN messenger to
show pretty pictures etc.
---
Blux
© 1990-2025 Balanced Alternative Techniques ry. All rights reserved. BatMUD™ is a registered trademark of Balanced Alternative Techniques ry.
The individual comments are the property of their posters, and may not reflect the views or opinions of the administration.