This is mostly in response to Blayke's war-post, but because i'm handless,
this being my first(!) newspost, i'll keep it brief and simple
Two points:
Firstly, you state that Irak is not willing to work within the framework of
international law, and at the same time advocate attack against Iraq, as I
understand it, even without the consent of the UN. Which in itself is also
against the framework of international law. Are you saying that USA can go
against international law, whereas Iraq can not?
Secondly, Saddam being allied with Osama and so on. Iraq is a very secular
state, whereas Osama is a religious fanatic. Logically, Osama should oppose
Saddam and vice versa. Though it might be, that the enemy of my enemy is my
friend, but somehow I still doubt it..
My two minor points about few inconsistencies.. I'm sure there's more, but
this without any moral preaching.
Cheers, Male