yeah these news ratings are probably the worst idea ever implimented on the
news system. I mean wow, like anyone here actually gives a shit about what
anyone else says in the first place!! the rating has no meaning whatsoever and
is more like a fun game of tug and war to see who can get the most negatives
on a certain article, Good Job guys!!
yeah these news ratings are probably the worst idea ever implimented on the
news system. I mean wow, like anyone here actually gives a shit about what
anyone else says in the first place!! the rating has no meaning whatsoever and
is more like a fun game of tug and war to see who can get the most negatives
on a certain article, Good Job guys!!
<-> Blackstar <->
Utterly bs post without having thought a single second on the idea of news
ratings, and also haven't read my explanations of it.
yeah these news ratings are probably the worst idea ever implimented on the
news system. I mean wow, like anyone here actually gives a shit about what
anyone else says in the first place!! the rating has no meaning whatsoever and
is more like a fun game of tug and war to see who can get the most negatives
on a certain article, Good Job guys!!
<-> Blackstar <->
Your flames are the worst ever because they're not just flames, they're
stupid, stupid babbling.
yeah these news ratings are probably the worst idea ever implimented on the
news system. I mean wow, like anyone here actually gives a shit about what
anyone else says in the first place!! the rating has no meaning whatsoever and
is more like a fun game of tug and war to see who can get the most negatives
on a certain article, Good Job guys!!
<-> Blackstar <->
It's an opinion. Just as you have your opinion of ratings suck, others are
entitled to their opinion of articles. Does it cause you any trouble to have
it? 1 line of spam per article can be saved if you gag it using a mud client.
Player ratings, don't check it or gag it.