Shaggydope wrote:
perhaps take the number of whines and think that maybe the "good idea" you had
wasn't such a good idea? As i've said before, seems to be that the old saying
"The needs of the many outweigh those of the few" has been twisted around here
in bat.
I don't know how it got this way, but players have learned that if they whine
long enough, they will get what they want. Current administration is scared
of whines for some reason and will do anything to fix them. This is a screwed
up system that is in place now, and like I said, I don't know how it got this
way. SBit by bit, year by year this is what Bat has turned into. People who
do not know the inner workings of the game asking/whining for things and admin
who know the inner workings of the game making questionable changes just to
shut you fuckers up. The needs of the many DO outweigh those of the few.
Whiners are still in the minority, the vast minority, and making changes to
shut you up is just bad decision making. We have like 1000's and 1000's of
players. 10 of them whine. So this means it is a valid idea? Let's look at
the multiple thousands of players that do not whine about some of our changes
and decisions, and by your logic, it means they ARE good ideas.
Whiners ask for changes that directly benefit them and has unseen side-effects
complications unseeable by mortals. Nothing wrong with mortals, you just
don't see the code or know how everything interacts. What seems like an easy,
simple change can actually be very complicated to implement, could just be
impossible, or may have even been tried once with failed results. Sometimes a
whine can actually be a good idea, sometimes they are great ideas and get
implemented and makes everyone happy. But usually, it just an extremely small
'inner circle' of people that would rather cry than adapt.