Quote:
In the sprit of the recent armor uptune(?), towards something more realistic,
I\'d like some additional armor slots.
Well, there is not missing that much slots.
Back, knees, lower legs, shoulders, elbows and forearms.
Its for sure that kilt does not protect knees or lower legs nor does greaves
protect upper legs, groin or knees. Nor does Breastplate protect your back
(its the front piece of Cuirass).
I suppose the present armours would protect (part of) the missing slots but
they are still missing, never the less.
There was talk about correcting the armour slots and/or armour names earlier
(around post 6257 on same news group) but it was shot down by not being
significant enough to gain wiz intrest.
Quote:
Well, really just one. Shirt. I find it amusing that you can\'t wear a
breastplate if you have a muscle shirt on. There must be other examples, and
even if thre arent, it opens up a whole new slot for eq to be created for.
Like said, that shirt should got to clothing.
I feel more amused about the fact that the monster who has the shirt is equiped
for battle is wearing only a shirt for protection. The monster is smart enough
to cast spells but decides to encounter its enemys steel with a muscle shirt
on?
Yes yes its funny, muscle shirt ha ha, but retarded on a long run.
A

hits you.