Please bring it back that when you open up typo/bug report you can see who it
is going to. I can't remember the reasons this was taken away, so it might
make sense to not be there, but I have another solution!
Make it so that when you send a report, if it goes to an inactive wiz, that we
can 'forward' it to another active one? Or at least update reports so that it
goes to the wiz who is maintaining the area/objects/etc currently?
I'm one of those people, that when I see a typo, I always report it. Sometimes
I feel quite futile in my attempts to help fix descriptions when I see my
reports to go wizzes such as:
1862 | 11.01.06 | Ikar | OPEN
1713 | 18.10.05 | Hablo | OPEN
1652 | 28.09.05 | Therp | OPEN
And others which haven't been on in 2yrs+. I don't know how actively wizzes go
through inactive wizzes reports but, I think _something_ needs to be changed
about this feature so that things reported actually get seen by an active
admin. even if they are not fixed.
Please bring it back that when you open up typo/bug report you can see who it
is going to. I can't remember the reasons this was taken away, so it might
make sense to not be there, but I have another solution!
Make it so that when you send a report, if it goes to an inactive wiz, that we
can 'forward' it to another active one? Or at least update reports so that it
goes to the wiz who is maintaining the area/objects/etc currently?
I'm one of those people, that when I see a typo, I always report it. Sometimes
I feel quite futile in my attempts to help fix descriptions when I see my
reports to go wizzes such as:
1862 | 11.01.06 | Ikar | OPEN
1713 | 18.10.05 | Hablo | OPEN
1652 | 28.09.05 | Therp | OPEN
And others which haven't been on in 2yrs+. I don't know how actively wizzes go
through inactive wizzes reports but, I think _something_ needs to be changed
about this feature so that things reported actually get seen by an active
admin. even if they are not fixed.
-Azalea
Don't worry, we see them all. We have a nice tracking system here, which
doesn't let your bugs rot away even if it's assigned to a wizard that is long
gone.
The feature you're asking for, however, will not be implemented, due to the
same reasons it was removed. It was mis-used (read: abused).