When suggesting ideas to ideas-wanted, please bear in mind that we only
have a limited amount of coders (wizards) and an even more limited amount
of approvers (archwizards) who can review the code. And we don't have plans
to massively increase either group. Quality over quantity, or something like
that.
Hence, while we do appreciate suggestions for things that could be
implemented, it would be nice if you as players, would ask yourself if
the feature(s) you are suggesting really adds any proper value to the
game. In my view, a properly worded post to ideas-wanted would ideally
contain a description of the feature, and an explanation why that feature
is really needed. That will allow us to better consider a priority for
the change.
What we DON'T need is for other players to scream and flame (usually in
caps) people that post their ideas tho.
Even tho this article is an reply to an existing article, it is no way
intended to single out this one thread, but more meant as a guideline for
anybody who suggests new ideas. This idea atleast had some sense in it,
even tho the "work needed/added value"-ratio of it is quite low
++ Gore