Nargar wrote:
Quote:
Please, please, please can we have some protection against crits.
Perhaps if unarmed parry skill provided this protection along with its
normal
Quote:
effect. The more you parry the more crit level reduction you get. This
could
Quote:
also be effected by the vital points skill, which at the moment is next
to
Quote:
useless for monks.
Heh, so you want the full benefits of a shield without a shield, because
monks got unarmed parry they didn\'t have before?
And your whining about less hp is useless because crimsons (for example)
don\'t get tarmalen to go with.
Maybe you\'d consider it fair for a one guild monk but suggesting these
you should also consider what it would cause with a combo. Your idea would
make monktarmas for example unstoppable compared to other tank guilds when
it comes to tanking big monsters.
I don't think it would actually make monk tarmas that much more use against
large mobs. How would they be much more powerful?
I accept that tarma levels are very useful, and I'm not saying that monks
should be made into considerably better tanks.
I could use a shield now, but then I'd be defensively worse off than before
unarmed parry was introduced - cos dodge is lower. And what is the benefit of
allowing crit reduction without a shield? Seems that you get one MA attack
rather than a shield bash. This isn't going to make monks much more powerful.
Remember that there are templar monks out there - they get monk benefits with
parry and riposte.
But I do understand your point - if a monk could stand in the front row like a
nomad tank then monks would become the tank of choice for many occasions.
However, I see this as only being the case for much higher level players.
The main point of my post was simply that as things stand I seem to be better
off carrying a shield and not using unarmed parry (not being able to). Whereas
before the tune I would have at least had some more dodge.
Surely it's not unreasonable to ask for a skill or some such that allows monks
to be able to get some shield type of benefit without loosing some of their
defensive ability?