Download Game! Currently 59 players and visitors. Last logged in:VroragEmailGadiganNatw

BatMUD Forums > Ideas-wanted > Re: Guild lvl costs

 
 
#1
13 Oct 2003 13:10
 
 
I have this nice idea about guild costs, how about making them so, that you
would only need to pay once for guild levels in a certain guild, once you pay
it's permanent.
Ie. You reinc to max ranger, pay for the guild lvls and then reinc again to
max ranger you would not need to pay for the guild lvls again.. but ofcourse
if you reinc to another guild you would need to pay. Simple isn't it?
But why would this be needed? Because it would be "fun" to just "play" and to
not think about "how i'm going to get my next reincs money".. ofcourse it
would still need much money to get all guild lvls in the mud paid, so it would
not be so "unbalancing" because money would still be sucked away from the
game. And on the long run it would probably reduce the amount of "raped for
money" eq from the sales, which is always a good thing.
Thank you for your time and hope i'll get some comments on this.
-Raksu

 
 
 
Graxrah
1y, 5d, 7h, 30m, 17s old
Level:
70
 
 
#2
13 Oct 2003 13:10
 
 
Quote:
I have this nice idea about guild costs, how about making them so, that
you
Quote:
would only need to pay once for guild levels in a certain guild, once
you pay
Quote:
it\'s permanent.
Ie. You reinc to max ranger, pay for the guild lvls and then reinc again
to
Quote:
max ranger you would not need to pay for the guild lvls again.. but
ofcourse
Quote:
if you reinc to another guild you would need to pay. Simple isn\'t it?
Quote:
But why would this be needed? Because it would be \"fun\" to just
\"play\" and to
Quote:
not think about \"how i\'m going to get my next reincs money\"..
ofcourse it
Quote:
would still need much money to get all guild lvls in the mud paid, so it
would
Quote:
not be so \"unbalancing\" because money would still be sucked away
from the
Quote:
game. And on the long run it would probably reduce the amount of
\"raped for
Quote:
money\" eq from the sales, which is always a good thing.
Thank you for your time and hope i\'ll get some comments on this.
-Raksu
You hoped for comments so here goes.

Reinc cost (that being guild levels) is pretty much the only thing sucking
money out of the game, and as we speak it\'s still an insufficient way
of draining the money so I\'d say a strict \'no\' to your idea.
Although the idea is not bad but the game situation as it is now does not
really allow it.

I\'m not speaking on behald of wizards or archwizards though, this was
purely my opinion derived from my knowledge or the lack of it.

 
 
 
Huppu
1y, 172d, 12h, 28m, 49s old
Level:
79
 
 
#3
14 Oct 2003 01:36
 
 
Huppu wrote:
Quote:
I have this nice idea about guild costs, how about making them so, that
you
Quote:
would only need to pay once for guild levels in a certain guild, once
you pay
Quote:
it\'s permanent.
Ie. You reinc to max ranger, pay for the guild lvls and then reinc again
to
Quote:
max ranger you would not need to pay for the guild lvls again.. but
ofcourse
Quote:
if you reinc to another guild you would need to pay. Simple isn\'t it?
Quote:
But why would this be needed? Because it would be \"fun\" to just
\"play\" and to
Quote:
not think about \"how i\'m going to get my next reincs money\"..
ofcourse it
Quote:
would still need much money to get all guild lvls in the mud paid, so it
would
Quote:
not be so \"unbalancing\" because money would still be sucked away
from the
Quote:
game. And on the long run it would probably reduce the amount of
\"raped for
Quote:
money\" eq from the sales, which is always a good thing.
Thank you for your time and hope i\'ll get some comments on this.
-Raksu
You hoped for comments so here goes.

Reinc cost (that being guild levels) is pretty much the only thing sucking
money out of the game, and as we speak it\'s still an insufficient way
of draining the money so I\'d say a strict \'no\' to your idea.
Although the idea is not bad but the game situation as it is now does not
really allow it.

I\'m not speaking on behald of wizards or archwizards though, this was
purely my opinion derived from my knowledge or the lack of it.
Huppu be right

 
 
 
Duke
A r c h w i z a r d
1y, 82d, 22h, 3m, 43s old
Level:
420 [Wizard]