Covert Iraq-Iran Alliance Prepares to Destroy Zion "Come into my parlor..."
said the spider to the fly

Copyright Joe Vialls, 12 August 2004

Since 1989 Iraq and Iran have quietly amassed more than three
hundred block-2 Aérospatiale Matra Exocet and Chinese C 801 sea-
skimming missiles, purchased to protect Middle East crude oil from
theft. Back in 1982 a single Exocet was responsible for sinking the
British destroyer HMS Sheffield, and then in 1987 another single
Exocet cut the American frigate USS Stark in half. Now these 300+
refurbished and updated sea-skimmers have been placed on high alert.
Their most likely target is a giant U.S. aircraft carrier trapped in
the narrow waters of the Persian Gulf, loaded down with 70 aircraft
and 5,500 very vulnerable American sailors. As American troops
remain trapped inside Vietnam-style fortified fire bases in Iraq,
their political masters in New York are realising too late that Iran
guards the only line of retreat back down the Persian Gulf. The quasi
Judeo-Christian 'Coalition of the Willing' is fast becoming
the 'Coalition of the Damned'.

Back in December 2003 when I accurately forecast 4
months in advance that Shi'ite leader Moqtada al-Sadr would "open a
southern front against the [Zionist] invaders in Iraq", my prediction
was not derived from black magic or some sort of mystical extra
sensory perception. Though at the time it probably seemed impossible
to most in the west that Shi'ite and Sunni Muslims could or would
fight together against America and the Jewish State, such action has
in fact been inevitable since the late eighties, when Iraq and Iran
formed a covert alliance designed from the outset to rid the entire
Middle East of Zionist insurgents forever.
Though this powerful alliance has been generally known to
the upper levels of Arab and Persian intelligence agencies in the
Middle East for many years, it was easy to hide from countries in the
west, who believed what they were taught to believe, and who then in
turn forced their false beliefs onto the people by way of the ever-
compliant media. "Shi'ite Muslims hate Sunni Muslims" and so on, and
just to prove it President Hussein ruthlessly put down a Shi'ite
uprising in southern Iraq. It was a stunning and thus utterly
convincing put down, because these particular Shi'ites were working
for the American CIA rather than for Baghdad or Tehran, making their
demise in sovereign Iraq inevitable.
The western intelligence agencies should have been able to
recognise the deadly Alliance for what it really was, but most of
them sadly lacked the capacity to do so. With the exception of
Germany and France, who tend to stand aside from the pack, the
agencies of America [CIA], Britain [MI6], Palestine [Mossad] and
Australia [ASIS] act like a giant global club, where each member of
the club believes the rumors of other club members to the exclusion
of all else. So when the Mossad says "Shi'ites hate Sunnis", there
is a faint echo of obsequious agreement from the CIA, MI6 and ASIS.
Considerably amused by this gross and thus fatally flawed 'western
intelligence', the French SDECE in particular keeps its distance,
ordering its agents not to spoil the Zionist party by injecting real
truth where it might not be welcome.
Most thinking people in the west will be able to
understand the Shi'ite - Sunni Alliance perfectly well, based on
their own [mostly Christian] history. Though for centuries Roman
Catholics and Protestants cheerfully slaughtered each other by the
thousand, in recent times both splinter groups of the same religion
have fought side by side in conflicts like World War II, to defeat
what both factions jointly believed to be an 'evil' foe. Rest assured
that Shi'ite and Sunni Muslims react in exactly the same way, and
will fight to the death in order to rid their sovereign nations of
Christian and Jewish invaders
It is with the reality of this alliance in mind that we
must view the latest developments in Iraq and Iran, because it is the
only way to decode what is really happening. Though Sunni Baathist
Republican Guard attacks on Americans and collaborators in the north
of Iraq appear detached from Shi'ite Mehdi Army attacks on Americans
and collaborators in the south, they are in reality fully-coordinated
strikes by two separate oversized brigades of the same Alliance army,
equipped with a very sophisticated military Command Control
Communications intelligence [C3i] structure.
The first hard intelligence of the Iraq-Iran alliance was
in full public view thirteen years ago, but was completely missed by
observers in the west, due partly to the fog of war, and partly to
the boastful antics of "Stormin' Norman" and his bevy of adoring
junior American army officers. When President Hussein ordered that
all serviceable jets and Exocet-equipped helicopters be transferred
to Iran, Stormin' Norman branded this an act of cowardice, scornfully
accusing the Iraqi Air Force of, "Running away from the fight". In
fact, Stormin' Norman had just viewed Act One of the Alliance's
master plan to remove all Zionists from the Middle East forever, but
he was just too stupid to recognize it.
Now think about this very carefully. At that time in
1991, both sides knew perfectly well that America completely lacked
the logistic support to invade Iraq nationwide, so the simplest
action for the Iraqis would have been to further disperse their
combat jets to more than fifty rudimentary satellite airstrips [easy
with Mirage and Mig fighters], and sit it out. If this was considered
insufficient, then a portion of the Iraqi Air Force could have been
temporarily dispersed into Sunni Jordan next door, because King
Hussein was very much on Iraq's side. But no, President Saddam
Hussein suddenly and inexplicably ordered that the entire Iraqi Air
Force be delivered to Shi'ite Iran, an apparent enemy he had fought
bitterly for eight long years at the behest of Wall Street.
Stormin' Norman's juvenile theatrics removed all
attention from the Iraqi aircrews, who arrived in Iran to a discreet
hero's welcome, before being flown back to the Iraqi border near
Baghdad in VIP helicopters. This very action alone tells you directly
that there was no intent to use these state-of-the-art Exocet launch
aircraft at any time during Gulf War I, but no one noticed back in
1991. CNN was frantically milking the increased revenue from the ever-
popular Stormin' Norman as fast as it could, and had no time to spare
for the analysis of distant and perhaps unsubstantiated events like
the total destruction of Zion. Life was wonderful for CNN investors,
and they merrily partied on through the night, while Iranian flight
mechanics carefully wheeled the precious Mirages and Exocets into
specially air-conditioned hangars.
During the years that followed Iraq and Iran publicly
threw swear words at each other, while keeping an eye on the distant
horizon for Zionists, who they knew would return one day, because
Wall Street always does when strategic oil reserves are there to be
pillaged. And while Iraq and Iran continued the false animosity,
China helped out behind the scenes by fitting a handful of ancient
Iranian F4 Phantoms and a host of Iraqi Mig 29s with slightly updated
home-grown versions of the French Exocet sea-skimmers, known only
as "C 801" and C 802". Iranian F4 aircraft successfully fired the C
801 during their 1997 exercise "Road To Jerusalem", which is a really
Freudian name for an anti-ship missile exercise, unless of course you
happen to be privy to Alliance forward planning.
Then finally, when Wall Street finally plucked up the
courage [and a couple of gullible allies called Great Britain and
Australia], the Iranians kept their eyes downcast, and humbly
murmured that they would not stand in the way of the "Coalition of
the Willing" illegally invading Iraq. Naturally enough perhaps, Wall
Street forgot to ask if Iran would allow them to leave again
afterwards.
Before the first American soldier even crossed the start
line in Kuwait, Russia had discreetly provided the Iraqi Republican
Guard with more than a thousand state-of-the-art Kornet anti-tank
missiles, and at the same time positioned advanced Sukhoi 27s
equipped with nuclear-tipped "Sunburn" supersonic cruise missiles in
both Iran and Syria. The Kornets, Exocets, and C 801/802 weapon
systems were free fire, i.e. the Iraqis and Iranians could use them
whenever they saw the need, but the Russians retained strict fire
control of the Sunburns.
Russia is the undeclared and slightly biased umpire for
this conflict, because it had and still has a mutual defense pact
with Iran. So although just one Sunburn could transform all of Tel
Aviv into heat and light in slightly under 80 seconds, Vladimir Putin
reserves the right to decide whether or not this final mammoth step
will be taken, because a 400 kiloton thermonuclear blast cannot
possibly be mistaken for anything else, which might in turn lead to
unpredictable complications at the international level. If at all
possible then, Iraq and Iran are required to expel or destroy the
Zionists invaders without resorting to critical nuclear weapons.
As we now know, the Russian Kornets were used to great
effect during the early phase of the invasion, knocking out a large
but unspecified number of "impregnable" American Abrams tanks, though
these lumbering beasts were never going to be a serious threat in
urban or desert warfare. The tanks eventually got bogged down with
everything else, and nowadays all of the American military in Iraq
spends 95% of its time sheltering inside giant fire bases reminiscent
of Vietnam, because whenever they stray outside the high walls,
somebody shoots them.
Somehow Rumsfeld [who was never a general] forgot that no
one but a madman tries to defeat fresh well-armed invaders with full
bellies, because they can be a real pain in the ass. Far better to
let the invaders get dirty and smelly over a few months, deliberately
restrict [blow up] their convoys of food, fuel, and especially water,
then start kicking sand in their faces when morale is rock-bottom and
they just want to go home to mom. Decimating a demoralized army is so
much easier, and requires less ammunition.
Early intelligence suggests initial Alliance strategy
was to hold the sea-skimmers in reserve until America was
comprehensively defeated on the ground in Iraq, then sink a frigate
or two as the U.S. fleet tried to exit the Persian Gulf, which in
turn is the only way back to America. The Persian Gulf is also the
biggest and best Exocet shooting gallery anywhere in the world. The
American defeat would then be highly visible and totally humiliating,
ensuring that just like Vietnam, the American people would not allow
its military sons and daughters to return for at least a century or
more.
This relatively mild strategy became obsolete the moment
that the Zionist Cabal recently decided to "take out" Moqtada al-Sadr
in Najaf, a man they regarded as a dangerous young upstart who could
be removed from the battle with minimal risk to the overall future of
Iraq. They could not have been more wrong, because in reality Moqtada
al-Sadr is the Alliance's chosen leader for southern Iraq, anointed
by both the Sunni Republican Guard in the north of Iraq, and by
leading Shi'ite clerics in Iran. As we shall see, if Moqtada al-Sadr
is killed or maimed, we will be into an altogether new and
exceedingly lethal ball game.
Understand clearly here that the American administration
and their puppets in Baghdad have always been aware of a "certain
risk" to American servicemen from the refurbished Exocets. Even the
remote "possibility" of an Exocet attack on the American Fleet led
Secretary Rumsfeld to demand that American aircraft carriers in the
Persian Gulf be conventionally powered rather than nuclear.
The Defense Secretary is not at all concerned by the
prospect of 5,500 dead American sailors, but his masters in New York
will sew his testicles into his mouth if an "avoidable" critical
nuclear event in any way contaminates what Wall Street regards as its
private reserves of crude oil in the Persian Gulf. Thus the current
fleet carrier in the Gulf is the expendable CV67 "John F. Kennedy", a
conventionally powered leviathan of some 80,950 tons, which requires
at least 30 nautical miles of sea room to take any meaningful evasive
action at all.
New York's sensitivity on the subject of sea-skimming
missiles briefly became clear two weeks ago on July 31, when China's
official news agency Xinhua reported from Baghdad, "Iraqi Defense
Minister Hazim Al Shaalan has announced that his country intends to
start negotiations with the Iranian government to restore the
airplanes smuggled to Iran by the former Iraqi regime" . "The former
Iraqi regime transferred a number of military airplanes to Iran
during the first Gulf war in 1991 to preserve them from the danger of
the air raids of the coalition forces, but Iran refused to return
them after the end of the military operations." The Iraqi defense
minister said that the airplanes are Iraqi properties and should be
returned to their original owner. "This issue would be discussed
through forming an ad hoc committee from the two sides" said the
hopeful puppet Iraqi defense minister.
Someone somewhere in downtown Manhattan panicked at this
sudden public exposure of the missing Iraqi aircraft, and immediately
pulled the western media into line. Not one western media outlet was
allowed to print a single detail about this Iraqi defense puppet
statement, for fear the American public would find out more than it
was allowed to know about the dramatically increased risk to its
loved ones overseas in the Persian Gulf. In less than 90 minutes, all
reference to this Xinhua press release, and links to the correct
Xinhua web page, had been completely wiped off the American
Google "Recent News" search engine, which must be a new Internet
world record. CV 67 John F. Kennedy: 80,950 tons of clumsy sitting duck,
complete with 5,500 American crew
There was plenty for Wall Street to panic about. As the vast
numbers of Iranian Exocet and C 801/802 missiles became increasingly
obvious, the numbed Zionist Cabal finally started to see the vague outline
of the massive trap that had been sprung. Every minute of every day, Iranian
AWACS aircraft record the precise movements and updated positions of every
American vessel in the Persian Gulf. In turn, this precision data is
fed to a string of fighter bases positioned north to south in western
Iran, where local operations continually program new target
coordinates into an array of sea-skimming missile guidance systems.
Try not to be misled by "sophisticated American defensive
systems', because no such systems exist that are even remotely
capable of countering a massed attack by sea-skimming Exocet and C
801/802 missiles. The Persian Gulf is only 100 miles wide on average,
and each missile travels just below the speed of sound at an altitude
of only six feet. Iran has all of the high ground, and American AWACS
aircraft will be unable to detect the Mirages and Migs until after
they burst out of the deep mountain valleys and over the Gulf proper
at sea level, travelling at 0.96 Mach. All aircraft will already be
on precise track for their American targets, as tersely advised in
advance by the Iranian AWACS.
You do the math. Because the Persian Gulf is relatively
shallow on the western side, large ships are generally restricted to
deeper water in the center, meaning that the John F. Kennedy is never
more than 50 miles away from the Iranian coastline, and considerably
closer when transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Let us call the range
fifty miles, because it will make no difference at all to the sea-
skimmers. Let us call the speed of the attack aircraft and the Exocet
missiles the same, at 700 miles per hour. From the earliest point at
which the attack aircraft can be spotted exiting the Iranian valleys,
maximum flight time for either aircraft or missile to the John F.
Kennedy is a scant 4.28 minutes.
Still time for American fighters to intercept the Iraqi
attack aircraft, you think? No, not a chance, not even a slight one.
Because the block 2 Exocet and C 801 both have ranges in excess of
fifty miles, all attack aircraft will launch within one minute of
breaking cover, then roll back for base at 0.96 Mach while still in
sovereign Iranian airspace. The launched Exocets and C 801s, probably
numbering between thirty and fifty in the first attack wave, will
continue on track at exactly the same speed, just 6 feet above the
sea, completely invisible to the radar on the AWACS aircraft and to
the radars of the U.S. fleet.
The accuracy and lethality of these relatively small sea-
skimming missiles should not be underestimated. On Tuesday May 4,
1982, two Argentine attack planes launched a pair of Exocets at the
British Fleet from a range of approximately 30 miles, with one of
them locking onto the British destroyer HMS Sheffield. Travelling
just below the speed of sound at an altitude between six and eight
feet, the Exocet hit Sheffield amidships just above the waterline,
its 350# directed-energy warhead penetrating deep inside the
electronic fire control room. HMS Sheffield caught fire and sank,
with the loss of 21 lives.
Five years later on May 17, 1987, a single Iraqi Mirage
locked onto the USS Stark in the Persian Gulf. Though by this time
the frigate was fitted with "sophisticated anti-Exocet defenses", its
radar completely failed to see the incoming Exocet, which hit the
bridge structure, causing massive damage and killing 37 American
sailors. In keeping with the best civilian Pentagon procedures, USS
Stark's skipper, Captain Glenn Brindel, was relieved of his command,
comprehensively scapegoated, and then forced to retire.
Try to remember that in each case, a single Exocet hit
amidships [i.e. a direct hit], and caused awesome damage out of all
proportion to the size and cost of the missile itself. Exocet is a
truly terrifying weapon against which there is still no effective
defense, and a minimum of 50% will strike their targets if an attack
is launched on an American carrier group in the Persian Gulf. Though
a handful might accidentally strike screening destroyers and
frigates, a conservative estimate indicates that a minimum of ten
Exocets would hit the carrier. Survival under these circumstances
would be extremely difficult.

Whether or not a premature attack is launched against
the carrier group, seems to be directly linked to the fate of Moqtada
al-Sadr in Najaf. The Zionists have been repeatedly warned to
leave him alone via diplomatic back channels, but at present it is
unclear whether or not the warning has been received and clearly
understood.
Moqtada al-Sadr is a key member of the Iraq-Iran
Alliance, meaning that a direct attack upon him is a direct attack on
both Iraq and Iran. Should the Americans succeed in killing or
maiming Moqtada al-Sadr, the balance of power in southern Iraq will
be upset to the point where Alliance plans will have to be
accelerated. In the casual view of this analyst, the chance of a
massed carrier strike will then increase tenfold in order to redress
the imbalance.
Those licking their lips at the possibility of reprisals
against Iran had best shut their mouths again, because there will not
be any. Every attack jet that bursts out of an Iranian valley will be
carrying the correct insignia of the Iraqi Air Force, notionally and
factually at war with America since the illegal invasion of its
sovereign territory. It will be defense at its very best, and
entirely allowable under the umpire's rules. If the Zionists ignore
the umpire and attack Iran, it is reasonable to expect that two
unstoppable Mach 2.0 supersonic nuclear Sunburns will then be
launched in the direction of Tel Aviv and Haifa. Game, set and
match.