Login to BatWeb
Forgot your password?
BatMUD Forums > Bs > Re: quiz
Q: What skill do barbarians get to 100%, crimsos to 50%, rangers to 80%,
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
Ratza wrote:
Q: What skill do barbarians get to 100%, crimsos to 50%, rangers to 80%,
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
and alertness which all are at 0% currently.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong." -- H L Mencken
Rating:
-2
Votes:
4
Calmar wrote:
Ratza wrote:
Q: What skill do barbarians get to 100%, crimsos to 50%, rangers to 80%,
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
and alertness which all are at 0% currently.
---
Blux
Rating:
2
Votes:
2
Blux wrote:
Calmar wrote:
Ratza wrote:
Q: What skill do barbarians get to 100%, crimsos to 50%, rangers to 80%,
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
and alertness which all are at 0% currently.
round somekind of bonus already. And comparing CIVILIZED background fighter
guild to NOMAD background fighter guild should leave a clear cap for nomads..
Donno if that cap is that clear atm.
Rating:
3
Votes:
3
All i'm asking is to fix the skill discipline, nothing else. It is fairly
unreasonable to punish hybrid tanks with a skill that ruins 90% of your
spellcasts in battle situations when the skill percent is 70%, plus 8% i get
from an eq. The guild itself is fine. I don't think anything else should be
done. I just can't understand the idea where for example strong barbarians
have time to train discipline to 100% while stylish sabres who are skilled
fencists get to train their discipline, one of the most important thing in
fencing too, just to 70%. I know the skill used to work differently in the
past, and it was maybe tuned to downtune hybrids, but does it make any sense?
v
unreasonable to punish hybrid tanks with a skill that ruins 90% of your
spellcasts in battle situations when the skill percent is 70%, plus 8% i get
from an eq. The guild itself is fine. I don't think anything else should be
done. I just can't understand the idea where for example strong barbarians
have time to train discipline to 100% while stylish sabres who are skilled
fencists get to train their discipline, one of the most important thing in
fencing too, just to 70%. I know the skill used to work differently in the
past, and it was maybe tuned to downtune hybrids, but does it make any sense?
v
Rating:
-1
Votes:
1
Cyberlahko wrote:
Blux wrote:
Calmar wrote:
Ratza wrote:
Q: What skill do barbarians get to 100%, crimsos to 50%, rangers to 80%,
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
sabres to 70%, etc?
( HINT : IT'S NOT WORKING AT ALL WITH 70% )
and alertness which all are at 0% currently.
round somekind of bonus already. And comparing CIVILIZED background fighter
guild to NOMAD background fighter guild should leave a clear cap for nomads..
Donno if that cap is that clear atm.
attack per round but as sabres are limited to short blades i hit cut/tear not
tear/incise/shred so it really does not rock so much. But this is right, some
big bad barb should hit harder than sabre. And I did not suggest that those
skills should be at 100%, some 50-70% would be quite decent i just cant see
why Sabres who fight with style dont have tumble or parry. And still i think
that alertness or find weakness dont rock the world so few % of those will not
make anything rock it is just quite boring to get ambushed by every monster,
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong." -- H L Mencken
Rating:
1
Votes:
1
© 1990-2024 Balanced Alternative Techniques ry. All rights reserved. BatMUD™ is a registered trademark of Balanced Alternative Techniques ry.
The individual comments are the property of their posters, and may not reflect the views or opinions of the administration.