I have no opinion one way or the other about Kimvais or his news posts,
however you're making no sense here Favorit.

If someone posts a lot of useless/bad/unpopular ideas, I would say it is
reasonable to worry that most of their implemented ideas are going to be
useless/bad/unpopular.

There is something called the ad-hominem fallacy. It does not follow to deny
a person's ability based on that person's personality. Logic.

It's that kind of thinking which will get you stabbed,
when your serial killer employee who had the superior
abilities to perform the job, flips out on you.
understand that logic?

- blackstar -

What if you don't give him a job and he flips out and stabs you for that
reason?

Ad-hominem fallacies consist of instances where an argument is attacked based
on the source of the argument. To the best of my knowledge of logic, saying
that the quality of someone's future ideas may be similar to the quality of
their past ideas is not inherently fallacious.

In the past, X's ideas have been bad. Past performance often indicates future
performance. It follows that X's future ideas may tend to be bad.

The problem is, you cannot compare this phantom "past performance" of kimvais
to his future performance in coding. Second, kimvais being a "bad" person,
does not still justfiy that person being a "bad" coder. That is the reference
to ad-hominem, even though this fallacy is used to describe arguments. Third,
is kimvais the code slave autonomous? Does not his ideas go through a
hierarchy, where it can be formed and fashioned into an approvable form? Your
little induction of predicting x's future is weak! For example, I as a child
performed horribly, does that mean under your argument that I as an adult will
perform badly? People grow, wisdom and experience is gained, we are
disciplined, and it follows for kimvais too. Your little induction gives no
chance for that.

I'll tell you what. If you're willing, we'll take this thread to an impartial,
third party logician, and have him/her adjudicate as to which of us is makes
the most compelling case. To make it fun, I suggest we wager 20 smackers (USD)
on the outcome as to whose statements are more fair and accurate. Or the loser
can buy the victor an equivalent prize via amazon.
I'll promise take any loss with good nature if you can do the same.

Like that makes me feel safe, one drunken night of approvals and suddenly all
races have five asses.

I do repeat that I have no special opinion about Kimvais.

In that case I want ass slot!
Also I want some uber eq I can wear in those ass slots!

-Hannah

I can hardly wait when we get the ass slots and maybe some uber eq that
provides bonuses for the black hole spell.