Elwood wrote:
Hackop wrote:
Juo wrote:
Nuane wrote:
Dralith wrote:
Acidia wrote:
Kimvais wrote:
You should've tossed your potato to him, Acidia!
Nothing to be fixed in the event if someone you have never heard of won it
just because no-one tossed the potato to him. He just got lucky that someone
else always 'won' the random draw on who gets the new potato when the previous
one exploded.
Well, if it's "working as intended", then from my post change the
"fix" to "could you please alter" to make this event worth participating
other than with triggering and idling.
Thank you,
~/A
Well, how about we just get rid of the event then? I mean an event that you
can win idly and get crap for it can't be worth having, it's just a waste of
space, right?
If altering it is not a possibility, then sure, why not. Honestly, I doubt
many people would miss it.
Perhaps we could also get rid of Biff Swift at the same time..
That is an unacceptable request. Biff and I are close friends. If he's
removed, I may feel the need to unleash my pent up aggressions into the mud.
We can't have that.
Would it make you feel better if instead of idling, the guy who won was just
sitting there chatting and not actually playing the game, but still never had
the potato thrown to him? I think the fact he was idle is irrelevant. As for
the reward not being worth the effort of keeping track of who is still in or
not, that is a valid point, and that can be looked into.
The only real difference is that if someone is sitting there chatting, we
don't know for a fact that s/he never touched a potato. Whereas, the idle
person clearly did not.
I like potatoes. It's one of my favorite events. It's silly, pointless, and
merely yields a silly, pointless title to the winner. All it needs is a tweak
in the algorithm for giving the new potatoes, making it more likely for idle
players to get them and therefore less likely for someone who has already
tossed one to get a new one.