To summarize few interesting talks I have had during these two weeks

About non-disclosure of information related to removes:

The non-disclosure lines related to removes are important, if you consider
that removes are related to abusing of game mechanics to harm the game it is
not always smart to reveal every detail. Also full disclosure in misdoings
against other player in-game might slander here either parties or give out too
much RL-info if remove was related to RL-threats. This all is about common
sense and thus rules/laws always expect people in deciding position to have
some.

Also not forced to full disclosure on playerbase doesn't mean you shouldn't be
accountable by your actions to fellow administration or not to have a valid
base of reason to give out. These rules aren't there to give you immunity to
mistreat other people as you please. Come on, you all know better than this
without saying!


To my point about someone else (in deciding level) contributing:

If for example Gore or Amarth (who both I have utmost respect over and trust
in steering of BatMUD and ry over the years) chip in to say that this kind of
action is totally acceptable and a way we want matters and people to be
handled here in future...

This is totally a valid call and "fine" in its own way naturally. Then I will
just tip my fedora and do my own conclusions if I want to be part of this or
not.

Zerks